wish meldon well

[Anonymous]

deadbeat dad has served reply for not paying support

[Meldon]

Post by Anonymous
deadbeat dad has served reply for not paying support

I've searched the legislation and there is no reference to such a term
as deadbeat dad so I suggest using it diverts from what is true.

[Meldon]

Post by Anonymous
deadbeat dad has served reply for not paying support

Silly rabbits can’t make a cogent argument without manufacturing false
evidence using pre-packaged law as a guide. That’s what you get for
bad intent.

It was really quite an experience. There is a thrill I’ve never
experienced and it is very empowering. Truth gives strength because
that’s the right side of the law. My strength and her weakness is
truth.

What a silly move and such a fitting end to a tragic situation. Forget
all the other stuff. The old crap that was by now 10 years old and
seems so irrelevant. With her sworn false affidavit, she hung herself
and her house of fraud, if I did my job right, must fall.

The argument begins and ends with the person’s moral character. If you
can show their blatant disregard for the truth and thereby the law,
there can be no court who would undertake the suggestion that such an
individual is a fit parent no matter how many diversions they can
think of. It would be unusual for a court to support her bid to hold
and consolidate full-custody under such a blatant act. They would
otherwise be placing full parental authority in the hands of a person
who has no actual understanding of the law and what it stands for.

Hire all the lawyers you want now. It won’t matter. I shouldn’t need
representation because when the argument becomes too twisted to
answer, I’ll just pull out the false affidavit which I’ll likely
frame.

[R***@hotinmale.com]

On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:14:31 -0700 (PDT), Meldon

Post by Anonymous
deadbeat dad has served reply for not paying support

Silly rabbits can’t make a cogent argument without manufacturing false
evidence using pre-packaged law as a guide. That’s what you get for
bad intent.
It was really quite an experience. There is a thrill I’ve never
experienced and it is very empowering. Truth gives strength because
that’s the right side of the law. My strength and her weakness is
truth.
What a silly move and such a fitting end to a tragic situation. Forget
all the other stuff. The old crap that was by now 10 years old and
seems so irrelevant. With her sworn false affidavit, she hung herself
and her house of fraud, if I did my job right, must fall.
The argument begins and ends with the person’s moral character. If you
can show their blatant disregard for the truth and thereby the law,
there can be no court who would undertake the suggestion that such an
individual is a fit parent no matter how many diversions they can
think of. It would be unusual for a court to support her bid to hold
and consolidate full-custody under such a blatant act. They would
otherwise be placing full parental authority in the hands of a person
who has no actual understanding of the law and what it stands for.
Hire all the lawyers you want now. It won’t matter. I shouldn’t need
representation because when the argument becomes too twisted to
answer, I’ll just pull out the false affidavit which I’ll likely
frame.

Plently of liars and fools are parents, no license or edumecation
required and the courts are under no obligation to decide on a persons
morals (within reason). (heh, kinda sounds like an empty case, shame
the judge is willing to accommodate a miscarriage of justice).

Haven't been around to follow the case, (my condolences for the set
back).

Instead of character assassination (I know, your concerns were in the
interests of the child) I'd have gone for the shared parenting model
and get her back to work and in a real job (even if it means paying
for her education).

[R***@hotinmale.com]

Post by Anonymous
deadbeat dad has served reply for not paying support

Hey, if she can't afford the kid she shouldn't have custody.

Meldon on the other hand can... doubly so if he doesn't have two
household to pay for.

There is an admitted bias in canada, politicians and judges usually
agree... if there's nothing seriously wrong with mom, then she gets
first choice.


Most guys in Canada don't care until it's too late. It has to do with,

-poorer educational standards for boys (actually working
against their better interests)
-a social net that guarantees higher living standards for
women
-advertisers pursuing a larger chunk of that higher standard
of living
-politicians pursuing that culled demographic (culled because
of advertisers)
-lowered expectations for canadian women

We haven't seen a major change in canadian marriage laws in 150 years
(which is odd considering the age of the country).



AND YOU BOYS SHOULD BE TALKI NG ABOUT THIS SHIT WITH HER BEFORE YOU
EVER STUCK IT IN. (although, many of your obligations might be covered
under canadian rape laws... if equalization ever comes about).

and love is not for control freaks

[Zapp Brannigan]

Post by R***@hotinmale.com
AND YOU BOYS SHOULD BE TALKI NG ABOUT THIS SHIT WITH HER BEFORE YOU
EVER STUCK IT IN. (although, many of your obligations might be covered
under canadian rape laws... if equalization ever comes about).
and love is not for control freaks

Look down! Way down!

See that prick?

Now suck it. And then go screw.


If you knew what equalization payments were all about, you would know.

It's not just about welfare. This country started from the East and moved
West.

The only thing I can agree with you about is how the Bloc Quebecois is
financed by the Canadian tax payer, because no one in Quebec has the guts to
send them money in support.

If that doesn't piss you off. Nothing will.

But, it has nothing to do at all with equalization payments. An idea
developed over a hundred years ago so Alberta wouldn't fail.

You do know that before Leduc in 1945 and well up until 1955, Alberta was a
basket case where the tumbleweed was the provincial flower, not the wild rose.

That's why we had equalization in the first place.