Why would you honor a child support agreement if the other party is making claims against you in court?

[Moderator]

Why would you honor a child support agreement if the other party is
making claims against you in court? Your child support gets used to
pay for the other party’s legal representation at the same time you
can’t afford representation for yourself. Yup tell me another one. I
don’t care what the law says, she doesn’t get money while she’s
making claims in court.

I surprised duty council when I asked about adoption. Lol. Clearly
they don’t get asked that one very much as it is not part of the game
plan fathers are supposed to follow. Council immediately launched into
an argument based on ethics and morals to which I replied, “I’m past
the emotional stuff”. Ha!

Council tried to first defend the child’s right to the father
(heeheee), then to defend the interests of the other party stating,
“it may not be best for those two people”, to which I pointed to
their many alleged complaints about my involvement.


Council came around however, and indicated making adoption as an
offer would be valid. Lol.

[Eric&Marcia]

Post by Moderator
Why would you honor a child support agreement if the other party is
making claims against you in court? Your child support gets used to
pay for the other party’s legal representation at the same time you
can’t afford representation for yourself. Yup tell me another one. I
don’t care what the law says, she doesn’t get money while she’s
making claims in court.

You pay child support no matter what because it's your child, no matter
what the law reads. This reminds me of my first wife, Gwen. I wanted to
stop payments because she was using the money to buy crack while she
screwed every 'brother' in the hood. Judge said I had to pay anyway,
even though the kid looked like one of those little niglets you see
hanging out with their mothers in trailer parks outside Boston. I
realized the judge was right; maybe the ho would drop dead and I'd get
custody. Unfortunately it didn't work out that way but I did meet
another ho who I am married to today. Fortunately this bitch can't make
babies.

[Ted]

Post by Eric&Marcia

Why would you  honor a child support agreement if the other party is
making claims against you in court? Your child support gets used to
pay for the  other party’s legal representation at the same time you
can’t afford representation for yourself. Yup tell me another one. I
don’t care  what the law says, she doesn’t get money while she’s
making claims in court.

You pay child support no matter what because it's your child, no matter
what the law reads. This reminds me of my first wife, Gwen. I wanted to
stop payments because she was using the money to buy crack while she
screwed every 'brother' in the hood. Judge said I had to pay anyway,
even though the kid looked like one of those little niglets you see
hanging out with their mothers in trailer parks outside Boston. I
realized the judge was right;

Doesn't look right to me. The judge didn't do anything to ensure that
the money went for the benefit of the child.

Post by Eric&Marcia
maybe the ho would drop dead and I'd get
custody.

If you were the one with the money, the judge should have given you
custody. No dropping dead need be involved.

Post by Eric&Marcia
Unfortunately it didn't work out that way but I did meet
another ho who I am married to today. Fortunately this bitch can't make
babies.

[Jon°]

Post by Eric&Marcia

Why would you  honor a child support agreement if the other party is
making claims against you in court? Your child support gets used to
pay for the  other party’s legal representation at the same time you
can’t afford representation for yourself. Yup tell me another one. I
don’t care  what the law says, she doesn’t get money while she’s
making claims in court.

You pay child support no matter what because it's your child, no matter
what the law reads. This reminds me of my first wife, Gwen. I wanted to
stop payments because she was using the money to buy crack while she
screwed every 'brother' in the hood. Judge said I had to pay anyway,
even though the kid looked like one of those little niglets you see
hanging out with their mothers in trailer parks outside Boston. I
realized the judge was right;

Doesn't look right to me.  The judge didn't do anything to ensure that
the money went for the benefit of the child.

Post by Eric&Marcia
maybe the ho would drop dead and I'd get
custody.

If you were the one with the money, the judge should have given you
custody.  No dropping dead need be involved.

Post by Eric&Marcia
Unfortunately it didn't work out that way but I did meet
another ho who I am married to today. Fortunately this bitch can't make
babies.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember this fact: Some years ago I got divorced, whilst the divorce
was going through I kept up all normal payments which consisted of ……
Mortgage, household expenses, kids education fees and the running of
my wife’s car and her normal outgoings…..This amount was considerable.

When the Decree Nisi went through my ex was awarded maintenance for
herself and the two boys for which I was allowed tax allowances. I
applied to the court for tax allowance backdated to the date I left
the marital home, I had stopped my married tax allowance to comply
with the law. ……They said they would allow this if my ex-wife agreed
that I had totally supported her during this time. (which I had been
doing even though she had a rich lover) They wanted a letter from her
or her solicitor agreeing that I had been paying this money.

Now the crunch line: Her solicitor wrote back saying that she would
give me the letter if I agreed (legally) to give her half the tax
rebate I would have received.

I told her to get stuffed and never claimed the tax back, a tax rebate
I was entitled to…..I felt that I would rather lose it if I had to
give her half. The amount was a considerable lump sum, but, no way,
was I going to pay her blood money.

Therefore remember this: Never trust the slimy cows…….Every one of
them is on the make, especially when they retain a solicitor who is
probably shagging them on the side as part payment for his bill. Woman
today have it made……..Our homosexually run, married families legal
system, is made up of laws that have been implemented to make
marriage unattractive to men…….This has been done to denigrate the
male sex and to try and turn some people into consorting with their
own genders, instead of getting married.

Now that same gender marriages are happening, one wonders what will
happen when they split up today…..Especially if they have adopted
kids, which this perverted government of ours is allowing.

[Andrew Usher]

Post by Jon°
Remember this fact: Some years ago I got divorced, whilst the divorce
was going through I kept up all normal payments which consisted of ……
Mortgage, household expenses, kids education fees and the running of
my wife’s car and her normal outgoings…..This amount was considerable.

You're responding to two trolls. Unless you are one too, please think
first.

The OP is absolutely right, of course.

Andrew Usher

[Moderator]

Post by Andrew Usher

Post by Jon°
Remember this fact: Some years ago I got divorced, whilst the divorce
was going through I kept up all normal payments which consisted of ……
Mortgage, household expenses, kids education fees and the running of
my wife’s car and her normal outgoings…..This amount was considerable.

You're responding to two trolls. Unless you are one too, please think
first.
The OP is absolutely right, of course.
Andrew Usher

Are you making any progress with your situation?