Discussion:
Somebody posing as a former remop LOL
(too old to reply)
krp
2009-10-27 08:49:27 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
Is this the "Ken Pangborne" nonsense still going on?
Once upon a time, I ran an ISP and had a member who Ken really had a
hard-on for. He was writing e-mails to me every day, sometimes several
times a day, DEMANDING that I suspend my member. Threatening all manner
of
civil and criminal action against me if I didn't do his bidding.
I see some things never change.
You COULDN'T be Dave, because he's not available.
He PROVED it! LOL
David has the potential to be available, but taking care of his
family is more important.
Yeah right. Taking care of his family. What BULLSHIT. What of Linda and his
kids? Or the kids from his first marriage he never supported?
freedom
2009-10-27 17:58:27 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
Is this the "Ken Pangborne" nonsense still going on?
Once upon a time, I ran an ISP and had a member who Ken really had a
hard-on for. He was writing e-mails to me every day, sometimes several
times a day, DEMANDING that I suspend my member. Threatening all manner
of
civil and criminal action against me if I didn't do his bidding.
I see some things never change.
You COULDN'T be Dave, because he's not available.
He PROVED it! LOL
David has the potential to be available, but taking care of his
family is more important.
Yeah right. Taking care of his family. What BULLSHIT. What of Linda and his
kids?
I don't have, nor have I ever had, an obligation to take care of anyone
named "Linda." Again, the closest I've come to this is an office manager
for one of my consulting projects, who spelled her name with a "y"....and
the only "obligation" I had was to ensure that a human resources tracking
database was working smoothly on her computer.

With regard to my kids, they're all right here under my roof, being
well-fed, clothed and enjoying a number of extracurricular activities.
With the exception of the baby, of course....
Post by krp
Or the kids from his first marriage he never supported?
I had one child from my first marriage, whom I supported and who has now
reached the age of majority (without having entered the porn
industry.....please try to contain your envy.) Feel free to show any proof
that I've ever failed to support any child, anywhere.

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals

"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml

"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$***@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>

"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him

"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to
claim that his name is David Moore

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services
**, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend


** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic

Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
Kent Wills
2009-10-28 08:16:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
You COULDN'T be Dave, because he's not available.
He PROVED it! LOL
David has the potential to be available, but taking care of his
family is more important.
Yeah right. Taking care of his family. What BULLSHIT. What of Linda and his
kids? Or the kids from his first marriage he never supported?
I wasn't aware his ex-wife is named Linda. He appears to be
unaware of this as well. In fact, the only person aware of this is
you.
Either everyone else is wrong and you are right, or you're wrong
and everyone else is correct. I think you can see the more plausible
option.
Whereas he's never been married to Linda, there is no way Linda
and David could have any children from the marriage. This means there
is no way for him to support or not support them.
You might want to spend some time thinking through your lies
before you post them. As it stands, you make it far to easy to expose
the flaws in your lies.

"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$***@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Kent Wills
2009-10-28 08:16:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
You COULDN'T be Dave, because he's not available.
He PROVED it! LOL
David has the potential to be available, but taking care of his
family is more important.
Yeah right. Taking care of his family. What BULLSHIT. What of Linda and his
kids? Or the kids from his first marriage he never supported?
I wasn't aware his ex-wife is named Linda. He appears to be
unaware of this as well. In fact, the only person aware of this is
you.
Either everyone else is wrong and you are right, or you're wrong
and everyone else is correct. I think you can see the more plausible
option.
Whereas he's never been married to Linda, there is no way Linda
and David could have any children from the marriage. This means there
is no way for him to support or not support them.
You might want to spend some time thinking through your lies
before you post them. As it stands, you make it far to easy to expose
the flaws in your lies.

"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$***@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
krp
2009-10-27 08:49:27 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
Is this the "Ken Pangborne" nonsense still going on?
Once upon a time, I ran an ISP and had a member who Ken really had a
hard-on for. He was writing e-mails to me every day, sometimes several
times a day, DEMANDING that I suspend my member. Threatening all manner
of
civil and criminal action against me if I didn't do his bidding.
I see some things never change.
You COULDN'T be Dave, because he's not available.
He PROVED it! LOL
David has the potential to be available, but taking care of his
family is more important.
Yeah right. Taking care of his family. What BULLSHIT. What of Linda and his
kids? Or the kids from his first marriage he never supported?

Loading...